<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Two Ravens Press</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tworavenspress.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tworavenspress.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>A blog about life in a small literary publisher ... on a remote Scottish croft</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 12:52:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Which wood did British literature lose itself in? And can we have it back, please? by Novel-nausea? &#171; Two Ravens Press</title>
		<link>http://tworavenspress.wordpress.com/2009/11/17/which-wood-did-british-literature-lose-itself-in-and-can-we-have-it-back-please/#comment-994</link>
		<dc:creator>Novel-nausea? &#171; Two Ravens Press</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 12:52:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tworavenspress.wordpress.com/?p=1099#comment-994</guid>
		<description>[...] unimagininative &#8217;same-old&#8217; novels (the kind so prevalent in modern British fiction that I regularly rant about on this blog) Smith nevertheless end son a positive note: Except, except. Then something remarkable [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] unimagininative &#8217;same-old&#8217; novels (the kind so prevalent in modern British fiction that I regularly rant about on this blog) Smith nevertheless end son a positive note: Except, except. Then something remarkable [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Spring in the air&#8230; by JedyMarfTerry</title>
		<link>http://tworavenspress.wordpress.com/2009/02/20/spring-in-the-air/#comment-992</link>
		<dc:creator>JedyMarfTerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 07:07:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tworavenspress.wordpress.com/?p=746#comment-992</guid>
		<description>Various of guys blog about this matter but you wrote down really true words.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Various of guys blog about this matter but you wrote down really true words.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Which wood did British literature lose itself in? And can we have it back, please? by Sharon</title>
		<link>http://tworavenspress.wordpress.com/2009/11/17/which-wood-did-british-literature-lose-itself-in-and-can-we-have-it-back-please/#comment-991</link>
		<dc:creator>Sharon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 07:01:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tworavenspress.wordpress.com/?p=1099#comment-991</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Suhayl. And I&#039;m fairly sure there are a few critics/ reviewers out there polishing my cross right now!!! (Nah. Sadly just one lone voice and not that important :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Suhayl. And I&#8217;m fairly sure there are a few critics/ reviewers out there polishing my cross right now!!! (Nah. Sadly just one lone voice and not that important :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Which wood did British literature lose itself in? And can we have it back, please? by Suhayl Saadi</title>
		<link>http://tworavenspress.wordpress.com/2009/11/17/which-wood-did-british-literature-lose-itself-in-and-can-we-have-it-back-please/#comment-990</link>
		<dc:creator>Suhayl Saadi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 20:29:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tworavenspress.wordpress.com/?p=1099#comment-990</guid>
		<description>Sharon, that was a brilliant article. When I took part in a programme on the BBC&#039;s &#039;Top Twenty&#039; (or soemthing of that sort) a few years ago (six years ago), I took in all kinds of books - many of them, translations, as it happens - in a giant sack as some of the works I would suggest people might wish to read. To be fair, the audience snapped up the titles, were very interested. I agree with you, though, I think that most readers (the public - you, me and the &#039;Man-on-the-Clapham bus) - have now been brainwashed by the soma that is contemporary entertainment of which society has become a reflection so that what began as marketing and PR technique and strategy in the context of capitalist triumphalism has now become fact, unquestioned orthodoxy. It was definitely not &#039;ever thus&#039;, not at all. So, in an almost Orwellian manner (but really it is Huxleyan) those Saduccees who hold the contemporary power of defining (meaning in) literature either ignore or else decry anyone who critiques this schema, whether overtly or through practice, as &#039;elitist&#039;, or (the ninth layer of Hell) &#039;intellectual&#039;. Any society which views thought as a bad thing is in deep trouble. But who gives a toss? And that&#039;s the problem. Those who refuse to bow to the tenets of the Saduccees tend to get crucified (as John Lennon might&#039;ve said, before he was shot).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sharon, that was a brilliant article. When I took part in a programme on the BBC&#8217;s &#8216;Top Twenty&#8217; (or soemthing of that sort) a few years ago (six years ago), I took in all kinds of books &#8211; many of them, translations, as it happens &#8211; in a giant sack as some of the works I would suggest people might wish to read. To be fair, the audience snapped up the titles, were very interested. I agree with you, though, I think that most readers (the public &#8211; you, me and the &#8216;Man-on-the-Clapham bus) &#8211; have now been brainwashed by the soma that is contemporary entertainment of which society has become a reflection so that what began as marketing and PR technique and strategy in the context of capitalist triumphalism has now become fact, unquestioned orthodoxy. It was definitely not &#8216;ever thus&#8217;, not at all. So, in an almost Orwellian manner (but really it is Huxleyan) those Saduccees who hold the contemporary power of defining (meaning in) literature either ignore or else decry anyone who critiques this schema, whether overtly or through practice, as &#8216;elitist&#8217;, or (the ninth layer of Hell) &#8216;intellectual&#8217;. Any society which views thought as a bad thing is in deep trouble. But who gives a toss? And that&#8217;s the problem. Those who refuse to bow to the tenets of the Saduccees tend to get crucified (as John Lennon might&#8217;ve said, before he was shot).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Double-whammy for Two Ravens Press on the Saltire Award shortlists by Lesley McDowell</title>
		<link>http://tworavenspress.wordpress.com/2009/11/20/double-whammy-for-two-ravens-press-on-the-saltire-award-shortlists/#comment-988</link>
		<dc:creator>Lesley McDowell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 10:40:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tworavenspress.wordpress.com/?p=1104#comment-988</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m amazed you&#039;re still banging on about this, Sharon, I had no idea I was so important! Best of luck to Esther, I wish her well. She&#039;s done very well with an unedited book.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m amazed you&#8217;re still banging on about this, Sharon, I had no idea I was so important! Best of luck to Esther, I wish her well. She&#8217;s done very well with an unedited book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Actions and reactions&#8230; by Double-whammy for Two Ravens Press on the Saltire Award shortlists &#171; Two Ravens Press</title>
		<link>http://tworavenspress.wordpress.com/2008/09/27/actions-and-reactions/#comment-987</link>
		<dc:creator>Double-whammy for Two Ravens Press on the Saltire Award shortlists &#171; Two Ravens Press</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 13:34:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tworavenspress.wordpress.com/?p=438#comment-987</guid>
		<description>[...] thing about that. Long-time readers of this blog may remember that back in September 2008 we took serious issue with a reviewer in The Scotsman who made a false statement about our editing policy (suggesting we [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] thing about that. Long-time readers of this blog may remember that back in September 2008 we took serious issue with a reviewer in The Scotsman who made a false statement about our editing policy (suggesting we [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Do you know the difference between God and an editor? &#8230; by Double-whammy for Two Ravens Press on the Saltire Award shortlists &#171; Two Ravens Press</title>
		<link>http://tworavenspress.wordpress.com/2008/10/01/do-you-know-the-difference-between-god-and-an-editor/#comment-986</link>
		<dc:creator>Double-whammy for Two Ravens Press on the Saltire Award shortlists &#171; Two Ravens Press</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 13:16:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tworavenspress.wordpress.com/?p=454#comment-986</guid>
		<description>[...] 2008 we took serious issue with a reviewer in The Scotsman who made a false statement about our editing policy (suggesting we didn&#8217;t do editing at all) in the context of a review of Piano Angel. But [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 2008 we took serious issue with a reviewer in The Scotsman who made a false statement about our editing policy (suggesting we didn&#8217;t do editing at all) in the context of a review of Piano Angel. But [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Which wood did British literature lose itself in? And can we have it back, please? by Donald</title>
		<link>http://tworavenspress.wordpress.com/2009/11/17/which-wood-did-british-literature-lose-itself-in-and-can-we-have-it-back-please/#comment-985</link>
		<dc:creator>Donald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 20:52:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tworavenspress.wordpress.com/?p=1099#comment-985</guid>
		<description>Must admit I agree with you about Banville - with one exception. I thought his novel &#039;The Untouchable&#039; about Anthony Blunt was terrific, a wonderfully-layered book about someone who betrayed himself, his country ...

And I also agree with you about the rest. Most of the great books I&#039;ve read over the last few years have come from Europe. Particularly the eastern end. Some of them too have been from south of the Pyrenees.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Must admit I agree with you about Banville &#8211; with one exception. I thought his novel &#8216;The Untouchable&#8217; about Anthony Blunt was terrific, a wonderfully-layered book about someone who betrayed himself, his country &#8230;</p>
<p>And I also agree with you about the rest. Most of the great books I&#8217;ve read over the last few years have come from Europe. Particularly the eastern end. Some of them too have been from south of the Pyrenees.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Which wood did British literature lose itself in? And can we have it back, please? by Sharon</title>
		<link>http://tworavenspress.wordpress.com/2009/11/17/which-wood-did-british-literature-lose-itself-in-and-can-we-have-it-back-please/#comment-984</link>
		<dc:creator>Sharon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 11:12:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tworavenspress.wordpress.com/?p=1099#comment-984</guid>
		<description>And a related article in Eurozine about Swedish literature (http://www.eurozine.com/articles/2008-09-23-thente-en.html has the following to say, in the context of a novel called Homemaking by Hans Koppel:

&quot;Some decades ago, British author J.G. Ballard described his vision of a future hell. He had accidentally found his way into a residential suburb of Düsseldorf, where he saw street after street of manicured lawns and perfectly straight hedges, with a BMW in every drive. That was the worst future he could imagine: a paralysing uniformity.

Reading Koppel&#039;s Homemaking, it is tempting to recall Ballard&#039;s vision and to conclude that we are living in his future. What Koppel describes is the utterly predictable, total tedium that living in a small western country in the year 2008 implies.

I wish I could have called Homemaking a satirical novel, but it isn&#039;t. It works within a realistic tradition, with scenes and analyses that individually hit the mark and make us laugh, but when taken together amount to a devastating portrait of the robot-like middle classes&#039; voluntary incarceration in the burglar-alarmed, electrified, homemade sheepfolds of post-capitalist society... 

Hans Koppel&#039;s novel may take a hatchet to the supposed good life at the top of the food chain, but its depiction of the way such a life is lived is borne out by various other novels published in the past year. These are mostly the simpler form of literature, written by bestselling women in the local chick-lit genre, and staggeringly neo-conservative. Of course there are small waves of dissatisfaction, particularly with sex roles – but in the final analysis they are nothing that the traditional nuclear family, another pregnancy, or a new patio can&#039;t fix.

We self-mockingly term them the problems of industrialized nations, those petty details that daily ruin our lives: disasters like the coffee shop on the corner running out of cardamom for our latte, or the Pride parade clashing with our middle daughter&#039;s birthday. Swedish literature currently abounds with problems like these. It&#039;s all very dull.&quot;

Exactly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And a related article in Eurozine about Swedish literature (<a href="http://www.eurozine.com/articles/2008-09-23-thente-en.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.eurozine.com/articles/2008-09-23-thente-en.html</a> has the following to say, in the context of a novel called Homemaking by Hans Koppel:</p>
<p>&#8220;Some decades ago, British author J.G. Ballard described his vision of a future hell. He had accidentally found his way into a residential suburb of Düsseldorf, where he saw street after street of manicured lawns and perfectly straight hedges, with a BMW in every drive. That was the worst future he could imagine: a paralysing uniformity.</p>
<p>Reading Koppel&#8217;s Homemaking, it is tempting to recall Ballard&#8217;s vision and to conclude that we are living in his future. What Koppel describes is the utterly predictable, total tedium that living in a small western country in the year 2008 implies.</p>
<p>I wish I could have called Homemaking a satirical novel, but it isn&#8217;t. It works within a realistic tradition, with scenes and analyses that individually hit the mark and make us laugh, but when taken together amount to a devastating portrait of the robot-like middle classes&#8217; voluntary incarceration in the burglar-alarmed, electrified, homemade sheepfolds of post-capitalist society&#8230; </p>
<p>Hans Koppel&#8217;s novel may take a hatchet to the supposed good life at the top of the food chain, but its depiction of the way such a life is lived is borne out by various other novels published in the past year. These are mostly the simpler form of literature, written by bestselling women in the local chick-lit genre, and staggeringly neo-conservative. Of course there are small waves of dissatisfaction, particularly with sex roles – but in the final analysis they are nothing that the traditional nuclear family, another pregnancy, or a new patio can&#8217;t fix.</p>
<p>We self-mockingly term them the problems of industrialized nations, those petty details that daily ruin our lives: disasters like the coffee shop on the corner running out of cardamom for our latte, or the Pride parade clashing with our middle daughter&#8217;s birthday. Swedish literature currently abounds with problems like these. It&#8217;s all very dull.&#8221;</p>
<p>Exactly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Which wood did British literature lose itself in? And can we have it back, please? by Sharon</title>
		<link>http://tworavenspress.wordpress.com/2009/11/17/which-wood-did-british-literature-lose-itself-in-and-can-we-have-it-back-please/#comment-983</link>
		<dc:creator>Sharon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 09:56:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tworavenspress.wordpress.com/?p=1099#comment-983</guid>
		<description>Hmmm - have to say that what we see from Scotland doesn&#039;t support that view yet (even though the majority of our authors are Scottish). There&#039;s a lot of self-flagellation goes on, along with old politics, and much of the same old issues coming up ... (sorry; now I&#039;ve offended our core market!)We genuinely don&#039;t really see much of a difference, either from very new young writers or older ones. And quality is for sure an issue. But we&#039;ll still be searching in a year or two, so let&#039;s hold out and see! - we&#039;d love it to be so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm &#8211; have to say that what we see from Scotland doesn&#8217;t support that view yet (even though the majority of our authors are Scottish). There&#8217;s a lot of self-flagellation goes on, along with old politics, and much of the same old issues coming up &#8230; (sorry; now I&#8217;ve offended our core market!)We genuinely don&#8217;t really see much of a difference, either from very new young writers or older ones. And quality is for sure an issue. But we&#8217;ll still be searching in a year or two, so let&#8217;s hold out and see! &#8211; we&#8217;d love it to be so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>