<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The further demise of the book review&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tworavenspress.wordpress.com/2008/12/07/the-further-demise-of-the-book-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tworavenspress.wordpress.com/2008/12/07/the-further-demise-of-the-book-review/</link>
	<description>A blog about life in a small literary publisher ... on a remote Scottish croft</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 11:22:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jeff</title>
		<link>http://tworavenspress.wordpress.com/2008/12/07/the-further-demise-of-the-book-review/#comment-679</link>
		<dc:creator>jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 13:25:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tworavenspress.wordpress.com/?p=633#comment-679</guid>
		<description>Of course, there&#039;s nothing stopping the professional critics from producing their finely crafted reviews on their own literary blogs.....except that they&#039;re unlikely to get paid for doing so.

Honestly ... I rarely read book reviews until after I have read a book. The reviewer generally gives away too much information about the book&#039;s plot and characters. But maybe that&#039;s just me. (Non-fiction is a different matter.)

Yet, I do read book reviews of books that I never have any intention of reading completely. For me, that&#039;s the most valuable function of book reviews. Of course, that doesn&#039;t do publishers any good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course, there&#8217;s nothing stopping the professional critics from producing their finely crafted reviews on their own literary blogs&#8230;..except that they&#8217;re unlikely to get paid for doing so.</p>
<p>Honestly &#8230; I rarely read book reviews until after I have read a book. The reviewer generally gives away too much information about the book&#8217;s plot and characters. But maybe that&#8217;s just me. (Non-fiction is a different matter.)</p>
<p>Yet, I do read book reviews of books that I never have any intention of reading completely. For me, that&#8217;s the most valuable function of book reviews. Of course, that doesn&#8217;t do publishers any good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: On the Book Industry and its Byproducts &#124; Better World Books Blog</title>
		<link>http://tworavenspress.wordpress.com/2008/12/07/the-further-demise-of-the-book-review/#comment-676</link>
		<dc:creator>On the Book Industry and its Byproducts &#124; Better World Books Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 21:50:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tworavenspress.wordpress.com/?p=633#comment-676</guid>
		<description>[...] the pond, Two Ravens Press weighs in on the book industry these days: The further demise of the book review is predicted by Robert McCrum in The Observer [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the pond, Two Ravens Press weighs in on the book industry these days: The further demise of the book review is predicted by Robert McCrum in The Observer [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
