Following up a little from Friday’s blog - and on the subject of what makes good literature and great novels…
A couple of months ago I finally picked Cormac McCarthy’s The Road out of my slowly diminishing pile of stuff that I must read, and was completely enthralled. First book for an age that I’ve read all the way through without being able to put it down. I’ve always been a fan of good dystopian fiction anyway (if you are, watch out on the TRP website next March for Stona Fitch’s Printer’s Devil, a fine forthcoming example of it) but something about this was especially compelling. The understated way that he handles such big issues – survival – not only of the human race and the planet, but of a couple of individuals in the face of extremity. Of course I’d heard of McCarthy before, but hadn’t really fancied any of his other novels – seemed all a bit male and violent and western for me. Then I saw the movie version of No Country for Old Men and thought it was absolutely brilliant, though I admit to being a little perplexed by the ending (probably because I had to get up and pee at a critical moment and missed a clue or two :- ) Because of the perlexity and my fascination with the way McCarthy could present apparently straightforward genre-style fiction and then turn it completely on its head, I did a bit of research into the guy. To find that he only ever gave one interview in his entire writing career – to the New York Times, in 1992. During which the interviewer said the following:
‘His list of those whom he calls the “good writers” – Melville, Dostoyevsky, Faulkner – precludes anyone who doesn’t “deal with issues of life and death.” Proust and Henry James don’t make the cut. “I don’t understand them,” he says. “To me, that’s not literature. A lot of writers who are considered good I consider strange.”‘
Bravo, Cormac McCarthy. That about sums it up for me too, and why I find so many novels lacking in substance. I want to read about situations that are life-and-death – not necessarily literally, with some crazed psychopath following the protagonist around with a gun – but books that deal with issues that are big enough that ultimately it’s the choice between life or death that’s at stake for the characters. That’s one of the things I was writing about in The Long Delirious Burning Blue - not giving in to your fears but taking them and using them, choosing to live fully, in complete awareness of the possibility of death – and what my second novel seems to be shaping up to be about, too: the fictions we make of love, suicide, death… (no, it’s not as grim as it sounds :- ) If I look back at the list of books that continue to matter to me, that have really made a big impression - those books haven’t ever been about, as I quoted Ian McMillan saying in Friday’s blog, “small people making small decisions over kitchen tables” - those books have been books that question, challenge or in some way illuminate the entire basis for our ability to continue to exist in a pretty insane world.
And with that … it’s time to head off down the croft to shovel some chicken shit!
Sharon




I have a mixed relationship with boats. I remember standing in the bay window of the flat we lived in when I was small watching ships going by on the Clyde. I remember too a trip on a steamer with my parents and grandparents – then the shock of the sudden oil reek and darkness and clattering of pistons when my father showed me the engine room.


